![]() Humans are very likely to empathize with the ems, much as we do when watching Westworld or Black Mirror, and so they will, by and large, want to prevent some of them from over-copying themselves and spoiling things for everyone. It also seems quite likely that human and/or early em society would institute whatever regulations, taxes, redistribution, and so forth were necessary to prevent this kind of Malthusian overpopulation. It seems plausible that no human minds exist that are both sane enough to do useful work and would be willing to copy themselves so much that they have to put up with the conditions that are hypothesized. Indeed, it is not clear what the ems are producing that doubles so quickly, other than more copies of themselves, or what they are actually working at for 12 hours per subjective high-speed day.įor selection effects to work, the traits to be selected for have to exist first. Such an explosive economic growth rate, which is what causes the places with no em labor regulations to quickly outcompete those that do have them, has been criticized by fellow-GMU economist Bryan Caplan. Even given his starting assumptions of ultra-cheap computing and uploading coming first, there are clear problems. Thankfully, it seems very unlikely that Hanson's scenario will come to pass. It is evident that any future in which most people are trapped in poverty and must spend most of their short lives working for subsistence is a major loss compared to a world where people have the freedom to enjoy a wide variety of what life has to offer. Another part appears to be the libertarian failure to distinguish between liberty and freedom - in such a world, the ems have liberty, but no freedom, due to their economic circumstances preventing them from having freedom to do things other than work, being slaves in all but name. Part of the problem appears to be that he thinks that 'potential people' have the same rights as actual people do that is, that nonexistent people's 'right to exist' supersedes the rights of actual people to prevent overpopulation. Hanson appears to be alone in thinking this is a good future. This is not a dystopian hellscape, but actually a desirable future, according to Hanson. The ems are okay with all this since only the most long-suffering ones reproduced so much and took over the economy. The ems, meanwhile, work up to 12 hours every day, just for bare subsistence wages, and have to be willing to allow temporary copies of themselves to be split off and later murdered ended when they are no longer needed. Regular humans live off their investments in the em economy and enjoy fantastic rates of return, since the economy now doubles in size every month. Additionally, ems who are willing to copy themselves many times and work for lower wages, longer hours, and in worse conditions will make more copies of themselves, and come to dominate the population, than ems who want to actually enjoy life are more demanding, as they fill every possible niche that opens up in the economy. As a result, they outcompete humans in the labor market. These ems, like software, can copy themselves, run in parallel as much as needed, and run much faster than humans, perhaps a thousand times as fast. In a nutshell, it goes like this: Before any de novo AI is ever built, human brains are scanned and uploaded to computers, becoming mind emulations, or 'ems' for short. Scott Alexander's review of The Age of Em Hanson's blog.“ ”fter reading Age of Em I feel like Robin Hanson would be able to come up with some super-solution even the psychopaths can’t think of… Everything about labor relations in Age of Em is like this. Wiblin, Robert & Keiran Harris (2018) Why we have to lie to ourselves about why we do what we do, according to Prof Robin Hanson, 80,000 Hours, March 28. Radhakrishnan, Anshuman (2020) Less is more: how Robin Hanson’s ideas elegantly frame human behavior, The Politic, June 15. Muehlhauser, Luke (2013) Robin hanson on serious futurism, Machine Intelligence Research Institute’s Blog, November 1. ![]() ![]() Robin Dale Hanson (born August 28, 1959) is an associate professor of economics at George Mason University and a research associate at the Future of Humanity Institute of Oxford University.īergal, Asya & Robert Long (2019) Conversation with Robin Hanson, AI Impacts, November 13.īerger, Alexander (2014) A conversation with Robin Hanson, Open Philanthropy, January 15.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |